Review of the Family History Seminar, “Land Research Workshop”

From left to right, Elaine Milam Vetter, DRT Library Committee Chairman; Donald Raney; Leslie Stapleton, DRT Library Director.

From left to right, Elaine Milam Vetter, DRT Library Committee Chairman; Donald Raney; Leslie Stapleton, DRT Library Director.

On Saturday, September 5, the DRT Library held its ninth family history seminar. This year’s speaker was Donald Raney, a sixth-generation Texan who has been an active genealogist for more than thirty years. He teaches genealogy courses at Richland College in Dallas and has presented sessions at many genealogical conferences throughout his career. His recently published book, Martin Varner, Texas Pioneer, 1785-1844, is about his great-great-great-grandfather.

Even though land records can be difficult to locate, navigate, use, and interpret, Mr. Raney began the seminar by arguing that they remain a highly valuable resource for genealogists for several reasons.

  • Before 1850, over 90% of American males owned land. This means that, if you had ancestors in the United States prior to 1850, chances are that you can find information about them in land records. This is important, asserted Mr. Raney, considering that many landowners were ordinary farmers who may have left a limited trail of records besides land documents.
  • Land records can assist in differentiating between individuals with the same name living in the same area at the same time.
  • Land records were among the first documents reconstructed after fires at county courthouses. These recreated records were based on landowners’ copies of deeds. Thus, while fires, wars, and natural disasters have destroyed other types of documents that might be helpful for genealogists, land records are usually still extant.

While Mr. Raney also talked about Texas land records and historic routes of migration in the United States, his primary focus was how to conduct genealogical research in state land states and federal land states.

Map showing federal land states in blue and state land states in cream. Image courtesy of www.nationatlas.gov.

Map showing federal land states in blue and state land states in cream. Image courtesy of www.nationalatlas.gov.

State land states are those states that retained the right to dispose of land within their borders. Lands in these states were never part of the public domain. The twenty state land states include the original thirteen colonies (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia) plus Maine, Vermont, West Virginia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Texas, and Hawaii.

The remaining thirty states are federal land states. When the United States was established, the state land states retained title to all public land within their boundaries. However, all of their land claims outside their boundaries were ceded to the United States government. As new territories were purchased or ceded to the federal government, title to all vacant lands in these territories was vested in it. These new territories became the public domain, and the federal government controlled the distribution of these lands.

Donald Raney speaking at the Family History Seminar.

Donald Raney speaking at the Family History Seminar.

Mr. Raney explained that genealogists need to be aware of the significant differences that exist between state land states and federal land states, which include:

  • How land was organized and measured: In state land states, land was described using metes and bounds, a method of surveying property which made use of natural physical and topographic features (e.g. trees, creeks, rivers, and swamps) in conjunction with measurements and artificially designated objects or places. By comparison, land in federal land states was divided using the public land survey system, which created grids of townships and ranges that were then subdivided into smaller sections.
The survey field notes (first page only shown here) taken for land David Crockett received in Bexar County is typical of the metes and bounds method. The surveyor used trees, roads, creeks, and rivers as markers along the property's boundaries.

The survey field notes (first page only shown here) taken for land David Crockett received in Bexar County are typical of the metes and bounds method.

Diagram showing how land in federal land states was divided into grids. Image courtesy of www.nationatlas.gov.

Diagram showing how land in federal land states was divided into grids. Image courtesy of www.nationalatlas.gov.

  • Where land records can be found: In state land states, records documenting original landowners (i.e. individuals who acquired property from the government) can be found in the appropriate state archives. In federal land states, these documents can be found in agencies of the federal government such as the National Archives and the Bureau of Land Management. In both types of states, subsequent landowners can be found in deed indexes and books, which are located in county records.

Throughout his four lectures, Mr. Raney discussed land records within the broader context of history and provided specific, practical information about how to access such documents. He talked about the history of how land has been distributed and acquired throughout American history as well as how governments have recorded those processes and transactions, arguing that using land records requires an understanding of these topics. Additionally, Mr. Raney described numerous places – including archives, libraries, and websites – where land records can be accessed and provided tips and methods for effectively using land documents for genealogical research.

Seminar attendees came away with much useful information from Mr. Raney.

Seminar attendees came away with much useful information from Mr. Raney.

Armed with a protractor, participants practiced mapping land boundaries and drawing plats using the metes and bounds method of land measurement and description.

Armed with a protractor, participants practiced mapping land boundaries and drawing plats using the metes and bounds method of land measurement and description.

Many thanks to Mr. Raney for providing such thought-provoking information and to the participants who attended this year’s Family History Seminar.

Click here for a full citation of the documents and images included in this entry.

Ninth Family History Seminar: Land Research Workshop

Join us on Saturday, September 5, for our ninth Family History Seminar. This year’s seminar will be a “Land Research Workshop” focusing on land records as an important resource in genealogical research. Participants will learn how to locate and use different types of federal and state land records such as maps and deeds. Our special guest speaker will be Mr. Donald Raney, a sixth-generation Texan who has been an active genealogist for over thirty years.

Registration is $45 per person, which includes a box lunch. Reservations will remain open as long as seating is available. Additional information about the seminar is available on the library’s website; you can also call the library at 210-225-1071 or send an email to drtl@drtl.org if you have further questions.

We hope to see you on September 5th!

Published in:  on August 4, 2009 at 10:38 am Leave a Comment
Tags: , ,

Review of the Family History Seminar, “Bursting Through Brick Walls”

From left to right, Leslie Stapleton, DRT Library Director; Connie Impelman, Library Committee Chairman; and Lloyd de Witt Bockstruck

From left to right, Leslie Stapleton, DRT Library Director; Connie Impelman, Library Committee Chairman; and Lloyd de Witt Bockstruck.

This past Saturday, the DRT Library held its eighth annual Family History Seminar. This year’s speaker was Lloyd de Witt Bockstruck, an award-winning and well-respected librarian, author, lecturer, and genealogist. Mr. Bockstruck has been a librarian at the Dallas Public Library since 1973 and currently serves as the supervisor of its genealogy department. He has also been a faculty member at the Institute of Genealogical and Historical Research at Samford University in Birmingham, Alabama, since 1974.

Mr. Bockstruck began the seminar by establishing a general framework or approach to genealogical research. He posed four questions to which both novice and experienced genealogists should return as they investigate their family’s history:

  • What do I want to find out or prove/document?
  • What kind of record would contain that information?
  • Where is that record located today?
  • How do I access those records?

These questions hint at one of the ideas underlying Mr. Bockstruck’s talk, namely the need for genealogists to think about the connection between an event in the past and how that event is represented in recorded history. He urged seminar participants to use record-generating events in their ancestors’ lives to guide their investigations. While typically family history researchers focus on an ancestor’s birth, marriage, and death, other events such as buying or selling land, attending school, serving in the military, and being involved in court disputes also generate records that contain information about an ancestor’s life.

Mr. Bockstruck answering a question during one of his presentations.

Mr. Bockstruck answers a question during one of his presentations.

The title of this year’s symposium was “Bursting Through Brick Walls,” and Mr. Bockstruck’s four presentations focused on illegitimacy; substitutes for birth and death records; pitfalls commonly encountered by genealogists; and onomatology, or the study of names. Individually and collectively, these talks offered guidance to participants on how to solve problems that might derail further genealogical investigation or prevent continued progress.

Mr. Bockstruck described many types of archival records that may contain information of importance to family history researchers. These include records of schools and universities, churches, and courts as well as newspapers, wills and probate documents, letters, and diaries. Records of federal, state, and local governments also contain a wealth of information for genealogists, who can utilize, for example, records pertaining to adoption, military service, voting, land transactions, coroners’ investigations, and each branch of government.

Seminar participants await the beginning of Mr. Bockstruck's presentation.

Seminar participants await the beginning of Mr. Bockstruck's presentation.

Once a genealogist has located and accessed a record, he or she then faces the challenge of interpreting its content. To successfully accomplish this, Mr. Bockstruck argued, a genealogist needs to become familiar with the time and place in which his or her ancestor lived, i.e. the historical context in which the original records were created. Specifically, Mr. Bockstruck emphasized how interpreting legal circumstances and word usage in older documents from a twenty-first-century perspective can result in a genealogist drawing incorrect conclusions from a record and spending a significant amount of time pursuing irrelevant lines of inquiry. Thus, Mr. Bockstruck urged participants to familiarize themselves with the customs that were known to and practiced by people living in the past.

Many thanks to Mr. Bockstruck for providing such thought-provoking information and to the participants who attended this year’s Family History Seminar.

Published in:  on September 24, 2008 at 4:36 pm Leave a Comment
Tags: , ,